DUI Defense Strategies You Should Be Aware Of
Denial is the most common defence for any crime or error. Denial, on the other hand, is possibly one of the least effective defences when facing a DUI charge. A competent DUI lawyer would be able to devise a plan to get you out of your predicament. A skilled DUI attorney understands that the only way to defend against a DUI charge is to dissect the facts presented by the arresting officer and the prosecutor. After all, rather than empirical and scientific facts, these evidences are often based on subjective opinion. Look at this website https://brydonlaw.com/legal-practice/criminal-defense/dui-lawyers/
The most difficult defence to overcome is a blood test result. Blood checks, on the other hand, are performed by medical technicians. They are also vulnerable to human error, no matter how long they have been in the industry. It’s likely that the exam was not correctly conducted. Even if a comprehensive investigation into the execution of the blood test should be conducted, the findings could still be challenged. The best option for a DUI defence is to call into question the arresting officer’s decision. The arresting officer must be able to show that there is a legitimate and constitutional justification for stopping and detaining the car.
The officer must be able to prove that there is a connection between the driver’s erratic driving conduct and his or her intoxication. Traffic violations include speeding, weaving in and out of lanes, swerving, and wandering in and out of lanes. They are not, however, always legitimate reasons for a DUI fee. A DUI attorney must show that the client’s erratic driving habits are due to various reasons in order to create a DUI defence against these erratic behaviours. The driver was talking on the phone, taking their eyes off the road to look for something in the back of the vehicle, or was simply annoyed by the children in the backseat. These erratic driving habits are unquestionably dangerous, but they do not always warrant a DUI fee.
If the arresting officer did not use a breathalyser, the smell of alcohol on the driver’s breath and a shabby or intoxicated appearance, such as a flushed face, bloodshot and watery eyes, slurred expression, and an unsteady gait, can be used as evidence. These signs, however, do not always indicate that the driver has exceeded the permissible blood alcohol limit. The scent of alcohol cannot be used as a gauge to determine blood alcohol content in a DUI defence. It is also not against the law to drive with a shabby look. Allergies, illness, exhaustion, or sleepiness may all trigger bloodshot, watery eyes, and a flushed face. Furthermore, an unsteady gait and slurred voice may be signs of weariness and nervousness as a result of the arresting officer’s questioning. A DUI attorney should be able to prove that the defendant was experiencing something other than intoxication at the time of the arrest.